Huey v. Sipprell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huey v. Sipprell

29 A.D.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 662 (Huey v. Sipprell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huey v. Sipprell, 29 A.D.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (which [as No. 2] was consolidated with another similar proceeding [No. 1]), judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 17, 1967, which severed the proceedings and, on motion of respondents, dismissed the petition on the merits as insufficient, reversed, on the law, and motion denied, with costs to petitioners. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. The time of respondents within which to answer the petition is extended until 10 days after service of the order hereon, with notice of entry. (See, Matter of Freedman v. Suffolk County Board of Supervisors, 29 A JD 2d 661.) Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur. [52 Misc 2d 670.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (which [as No. 2] was consolidated with another similar proceeding [No. 1]), judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 17, 1967, which severed the proceedings and, on motion of respondents, dismissed the petition on the merits as insufficient, reversed, on the law, and motion denied, with costs to petitioners. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. The time of respondents within which to answer the petition is extended until 10 days after service of the order hereon, with notice of entry. (See, Matter of Freedman v. Suffolk County Board of Supervisors, 29 A JD 2d 661.) Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur. [52 Misc 2d 670.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huey-v-sipprell-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack