Huewitt v. State

963 So. 2d 314, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730, 2007 WL 2317108
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 15, 2007
DocketNo. 4D07-2646
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 So. 2d 314 (Huewitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huewitt v. State, 963 So. 2d 314, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730, 2007 WL 2317108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The record reflects that appellant committed the underlying offense after the October 1,1998 effective date of the Criminal Punishment Code (CPC). The CPC permits a court to sentence a criminal defendant up to the statutory maximum without the need for written reasons or a departure. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704; § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Moore v. State, 882 So.2d 977, 984 (Fla.2004). Thus, appellant could be sentenced up to the statutory maximum for his offense without an “upward departure.”

SHAHOOD, C.J., GUNTHER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Children & Families v. ST
963 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
963 So. 2d 314, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730, 2007 WL 2317108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huewitt-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.