Huettl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 21, 2025
Docket23-0068V
StatusPublished

This text of Huettl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Huettl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huettl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************* TIFFANY HUETTL, * No. 23-68V as natural guardian and legal representative* of her minor son, R.H. * * Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran v. * * Filed: March 28, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************

Lawrence Cohan, Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner; Jamica Marie Littles, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On January 19, 2023, petitioner Tiffany Huettl filed a petition on behalf of her minor child R.H. for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 et seq. (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). Petitioner alleged that an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to R.H. on February 20, 2020, caused chronic osteomyelitis. Pet. at 1. On September 5, 2023, the undersigned ruled that petitioner is entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act.

On March 26, 2025, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, to which petitioner agrees. Based upon the record as a whole, the undersigned finds the Proffer reasonable and that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer the court awards petitioner:

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. Respondent proffers that R.H. should be awarded $150,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value.

A lump sum payment of $155,589.40, representing compensation for life care expenses in the first year after judgment ($5,589.40), and pain and suffering ($150,000.00), to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner as guardian/conservator of the estate of R.H., for the benefit of R.H. No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the guardian/conservator of R.H.’s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of R.H., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.H. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.

An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract, subject to the conditions described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased. Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner only so long as R.H. is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At the Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly, quarterly, annual or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart as Tab A describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be made in one annual installment.

Respondent proffers that a four percent (4%) growth rate should be applied to all non-medical life care items, and a five percent (5%) growth rate should be applied to all medical life care items. Thus, the benefits illustrated in the chart at Tab A that are to be paid through annuity payments should grow as follows: four percent (4%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for non-medical items, and five percent (5%) compounded annually from the date of judgment for medical items.

The petitioner will continue to receive the annuity payments from the Life Insurance Company only so long as R.H. is alive at the time that a particular payment is due. Written notice shall be provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Life Insurance Company within twenty (20) days of R.H.’s death.

2 No payments shall be made until petitioner provides respondent with documentation establishing that she has been appointed as the guardian(s)/conservator(s) of R.H.’s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.H., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of R.H. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 23-68V according to this decision and the attached proffer. 2

Any questions regarding this order may be directed to my law clerk, Josh Baker, at (202) 357-6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) TIFFANY HUETTL, as natural guardian and ) legal representative of her minor son, R.H., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 23-68V ) Special Master Moran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) ECF HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On January 19, 2023, Tiffany Huettl (“petitioner”), on behalf of her minor child, R.H.,

filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42

U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that as a result of receiving an

influenza (“flu”) vaccine on February 20, 2020, R.H. suffered from chronic osteomyelitis.

Petition, ECF No. 1 at 1. On September 5, 2023, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report conceding

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. ECF No. 26. Accordingly, on September

6, 2023, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to

vaccine compensation. ECF No. 31.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CLCP, and petitioner

engaged Roberta Hurley, Hurly Consulting, to provide an estimation of R.H.’s future vaccine-

injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described

in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Huettl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huettl-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.