Huestess v. South Atlantic Insurance

76 S.E. 117, 93 S.C. 148, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 303
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 6, 1912·No. 8363·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*149 Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

There was a former appeal in this case which is reported in 88 S. C. 31, 70 S. E. 403. This Court granted a new trial. Thereafter the defendant amended its answer, by order of the Circuit Court. On the second trial in the Circuit Court, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed upon numerous exceptions. A statement of the facts appears in the opinion rendered by the Court, on the former hearing.

The rulings of this Court on the former hearing, dispose of all the questions raised by the present appeal.

The argument of the appellants’ attorneys, is practically a review of those rulings. But they are not reviewable, as they are res adjudicata. Jones v. Ry., 65 S. C. 410, 43 S. E. 884; Brown v. Tel. Co., 92 S. C. 354.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Woods dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huestess v. South Atlantic Insurance, 76 S.E. 117, 93 S.C. 148, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 303 (S.C. 1912).

76 S.E. 117 (Huestess v. South Atlantic Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.
43 S.E. 884 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1903)
Huestess v. South Atlantic Life Ins.
70 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)