Huerta, Benjamin Martinez
This text of Huerta, Benjamin Martinez (Huerta, Benjamin Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,508-01
EX PARTE BENJAMIN MARTINEZ HUERTA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR18465-A IN THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT FROM WISE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual
assault of a child, and he was sentenced to forty years in prison.
Applicant alleges that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, rendering his guilty
plea involuntary, and he has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.
1999). There is no response from trial counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no
findings from the trial court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex -2-
parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective
assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and
tactical decisions. To obtain the response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised
in the writ application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of
law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be
obtained from this Court.
Filed: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Huerta, Benjamin Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huerta-benjamin-martinez-texcrimapp-2018.