Huenfeld Co. v. Sims

117 S.E. 413, 126 S.C. 143, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 155
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Huenfeld Co. v. Sims. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 S.C. 193
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 8, 1923·No. 11224·Published

Opinions

May 8, 1923.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from the following order:

"This matter comes before me on motion of the defendant to set aside a judgment (default), and permit her to answer on account of excusable mistake and inadvertence and excusable neglect. The showing made convinces me that the defendant should be permitted to answer. It is therefore ordered that the judgment heretofore entered in this case be and the same is set aside, and the clerk of this Court is directed to so enter. Ordered, further, that the defendant have fifteen days from this date in which to serve her answer on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, Cornelius Otts." *Page 144

Such an order is not appealable, unless there was an erroneous exercise of discretion on the part of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which has not been made to appear.

Appeal dismissed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS and FRASER concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huenfeld Co. v. Sims, 117 S.E. 413, 126 S.C. 143, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 155 (S.C. 1923).

117 S.E. 413 (Huenfeld Co. v. Sims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunton v. Harper
42 S.E. 153 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1902)
Cable Piano Co. v. Duncan
75 S.E. 552 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Brown v. Caldwell
84 S.E. 996 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)
McSween v. Windham
57 S.E. 847 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1907)
Huenfeld Co. v. Sims
112 S.E. 917 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)