Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hueitt v. Hueitt

Hueitt v. Hueitt

132 A.D.2d 951, 518 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49408
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.2d 951 (Hueitt v. Hueitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hueitt v. Hueitt, 132 A.D.2d 951, 518 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We find sufficient proof in the record to establish that defendant’s separate property appreciated in value due in part to plaintiff’s indirect and direct contributions (see, Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8; Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [3]). Defendant has failed to show that the increase in value of the property was merely the product of inflation or other market factors (see, Alwell v Alwell, 98 AD2d 549, 551). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — equitable distribution.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Price
503 N.E.2d 684 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Alwell v. Alwell
98 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.2d 951, 518 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hueitt-v-hueitt-nyappdiv-1987.