Hueitt v. Hueitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hueitt v. Hueitt

132 A.D.2d 951, 518 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49408

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 1987·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We find sufficient proof in the record to establish that defendant’s separate property appreciated in value due in part to plaintiff’s indirect and direct contributions (see, Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8; Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [3]). Defendant has failed to show that the increase in value of the property was merely the product of inflation or other market factors (see, Alwell v Alwell, 98 AD2d 549, 551). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — equitable distribution.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We find sufficient proof in the record to establish that defendant’s separate property appreciated in value due in part to plaintiff’s indirect and direct contributions (see, Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8; Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [d] [3]). Defendant has failed to show that the increase in value of the property was merely the product of inflation or other market factors (see, Alwell v Alwell, 98 AD2d 549, 551). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J. — equitable distribution.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Hueitt v. Hueitt, 132 A.D.2d 951, 518 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

132 A.D.2d 951 (Hueitt v. Hueitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related