Hudspeth v. United States

128 F.2d 615, 76 U.S. App. D.C. 422, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3653
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1942
DocketNo. 7617
StatusPublished

This text of 128 F.2d 615 (Hudspeth v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudspeth v. United States, 128 F.2d 615, 76 U.S. App. D.C. 422, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3653 (D.C. Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully examining the record in this case and after giving full consideration to the able argument of counsel who was appointed by the court to represent appellant, we are satisfied that no prejudicial error occurred in the trial of the case. Consequently, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 F.2d 615, 76 U.S. App. D.C. 422, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudspeth-v-united-states-cadc-1942.