Hudspeth v. Dvork

99 F.2d 69, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1938
DocketNos. 1666, 1667, 1673, 1701-1703
StatusPublished

This text of 99 F.2d 69 (Hudspeth v. Dvork) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudspeth v. Dvork, 99 F.2d 69, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (10th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

T^TTTT T TT^r, .. T j PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

These cases present the identical question decided in Aderhold, Warden, v. Ash-lock, 10 Cir., 99 F.2d 67, decided September 22, 1938, and on authority thereof, the several judgments appealed from are reversed and the causes remanded with instructions to vacate the several judgments directing the discharge of the appellees, to enter orders that appellees be redelivei ed to the custody of the Warden, and to issue and execute such writs or processes as may be necessary to make such orders effective.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aderhold v. Ashlock
99 F.2d 67 (Tenth Circuit, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F.2d 69, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudspeth-v-dvork-ca10-1938.