Hudspeth v. Bunzey
244 S.E.2d 154, 294 N.C. 736, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1304
This text of 244 S.E.2d 154 (Hudspeth v. Bunzey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hudspeth v. Bunzey, 244 S.E.2d 154, 294 N.C. 736, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1304 (N.C. 1978).
Opinion
Lloyd HUDSPETH
v.
Robert S. BUNZEY and Elizabeth O. Bunzey.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Echols, Purser & Adams, for defendants.
William H. Booe, for plaintiff.
Defendants' notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under GS 7A-31. 35 N.C.App. 231, 241 S.E.2d 119. Petition denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hudspeth v. Bunzey
241 S.E.2d 119 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
244 S.E.2d 154, 294 N.C. 736, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudspeth-v-bunzey-nc-1978.