Hudspath v. Olson
Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 MELVIN M. HUDSPATH, Case No. 3:20-cv-00638-LRH-CLB
6 Petitioner, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS 7 KYLE OLSON, et al., 8 (ECF Nos. 51, 54) Respondents. 9 10 This habeas matter is before the Court on Respondents’ motion to extend the deadline to 11 file and serve their answer to the Third Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 12 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 54). Previously, the Court extended the answer deadline to February 13 23, 2023. (ECF No. 49). Respondents move for a fifth extension of time, arguing that counsel 14 faced a personal emergency that prevented them from completing and filing the answer by the 15 deadline. (ECF No. 54 at 2). Counsel seeks an additional 7 days, up to and including March 2, 16 2023, to file the answer. (Id. at 3). The Court finds that good cause exists to extend the deadline 17 a fifth time. 18 Also before the Court is Respondents’ motion to seal Exhibit 72 to their answer. (ECF 19 No. 51). Respondents argue that compelling reasons exist to seal the exhibit because it its 20 Petitioner’s presentence investigation report and contains sensitive information that, if publicly 21 known, could jeopardize Petitioner’s safety and prison security. (ECF No. 51 at 2). Petitioner 22 does not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 53). Having reviewed the exhibit in camera, the Court 23 finds that it contains sensitive information about Petitioner that could be used for improper 24 purposes like placing his safety at risk. Further, the presentence report contains information that 25 is defined as confidential under Nevada law. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.156. The Court finds that 26 compelling reasons exist to seal the presentence report that outweigh the presumption favoring 27 public access. See Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096–97 (9th 28 Cir. 2016) (collecting cases). 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time to 2 || Answer Petitioner’s Third Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fifth Request) (ECF 3 || No. 54) is GRANTED. Respondents’ deadline to file an answer is EXTENDED to March 2, 4 || 2023. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Exhibit 72 in 6 || Camera and Under Seal (ECF No. 51) is GRANTED. Petitioner’s presentence report (ECF 7 || No. 52-1) will remain under seal. 8 DATED this 24" day of February, 2023. : lee 10 LA R. HICKS 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudspath v. Olson (Hudspath v. Olson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.