Hudson v. Wekiva Golf Club
This text of 503 So. 2d 453 (Hudson v. Wekiva Golf Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the deputy commissioner denying that the claimant sustained a com-pensable accident, on the ground that the injury was occasioned primarily by claimant’s intoxication, pursuant to Section 440.-09(3), Florida Statutes, is supported by competent, substantial evidence and it is affirmed. Although we do not disapprove the deputy’s acceptance of the results of the blood alcohol test taken by the claimant as admissible evidence, we strongly urge the Division of Workers’ Compensation to consider adopting appropriate rules which provide uniform breath and blood alcohol testing procedures, consistent with the procedures approved by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. See Fla.Admin.Code Rule 10D-42.21.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 453, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 712, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-wekiva-golf-club-fladistctapp-1987.