Hudson v. Villa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hudson v. Villa

204 A.D.2d 1033, 614 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6860

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Herkimer County Family Court (LaRaia, J.). We add only that Family Court properly determined that venue in Herkimer County was proper because petitioner resided there when the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]) and respondent failed to meet her burden of showing good cause for transfer of venue to Dutchess County (see, Family Ct Act § 174; CPLR 510 [3]; Matter of Tavolacci v Garges, 124 AD2d 734). (Appeal from Order of Herkimer County Family Court, LaRaia, J.—Custody.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Herkimer County Family Court (LaRaia, J.). We add only that Family Court properly determined that venue in Herkimer County was proper because petitioner resided there when the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]) and respondent failed to meet her burden of showing good cause for transfer of venue to Dutchess County (see, Family Ct Act § 174; CPLR 510 [3]; Matter of Tavolacci v Garges, 124 AD2d 734). (Appeal from Order of Herkimer County Family Court, LaRaia, J.—Custody.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Hudson v. Villa, 204 A.D.2d 1033, 614 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 1033 (Hudson v. Villa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related