Hudson v. Trillium Staffing

925 N.W.2d 254
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 9, 2019·No. A18-1896·Published

Opinion

Natalie E. Hudson, Associate Justice *255Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 25, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) ("Summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view. They do no more than establish the law of the case.").

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

Natalie E. Hudson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Trillium Staffing, 925 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. 2019).

925 N.W.2d 254 (Hudson v. Trillium Staffing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)