Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/Hudson v. Trillium Staffing

Hudson v. Trillium Staffing

925 N.W.2d 254
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 9, 2019
DocketA18-1896
StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.W.2d 254 (Hudson v. Trillium Staffing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Trillium Staffing, 925 N.W.2d 254 (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

Natalie E. Hudson, Associate Justice *255Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 25, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) ("Summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view. They do no more than establish the law of the case.").

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

Natalie E. Hudson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 N.W.2d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-trillium-staffing-minn-2019.