Hudson v. Tarlton

24 Misc. 770, 53 N.Y.S. 552
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided August 15, 1898·Published

Opinions

Schuchman, J.

The complaint sets up a cause of action for rents for January, February and March, 1898, for a store and cellar. The answer admits the cause of action set forth in the complaint and alleges by way of counterclaim damages arising to the use and occupation of the said premises for the month of November, 1897. It does not allege a-covenant on the-landlord’s part to repair. The answer, therefore, does not contain a good [771] cause of action by way of counterclaim. Reissman v. Jacobowitz, 22 Misc. Rep. 551.

Judgment appealed from reversed, with costs, and demurrer to counterclaim sustained, with costs to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Tarlton, 24 Misc. 770, 53 N.Y.S. 552 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

24 Misc. 770 (Hudson v. Tarlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgerton v. . Page
20 N.Y. 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 1859)
Romaine v. Brewster
30 N.Y.S. 948 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Reissman v. Jacobowitz
22 Misc. 551 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1898)