Hudson v. Stiles

90 S.E. 379, 146 Ga. 16, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 553
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The judgment in this case is affirmed under the rule that the discretion of the trial judge in granting or refusing an injunction on interlocutory hearing nuil not be interfered with, unless it is made to appear that there was an abuse of discretion.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Stiles, 90 S.E. 379, 146 Ga. 16, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 553 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 379 (Hudson v. Stiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tanner Grocery Co. v. Stewart
121 S.E. 416 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)