Hudson v. State

Fairfield Circuit Court

Hudson v. State

20 Ohio C.C. 660

DecidedJanuary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. 660 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfield Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. State, 20 Ohio C.C. 660 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After full argument and examination of numerous authorities, the court holds that the governor has the right to demand the surrender of a fugitive from this state, charged with a misdemeanor; and that section 95, relating to the matter of interstate extradition, does not in any way limit the authority and power vested in the executive by the federal constitution and the laws of congress.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After full argument and examination of numerous authorities, the court holds that the governor has the right to demand the surrender of a fugitive from this state, charged with a misdemeanor; and that section 95, relating to the matter of interstate extradition, does not in any way limit the authority and power vested in the executive by the federal constitution and the laws of congress.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ohio C.C. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-ohcirctfairfiel-1895.