Hudson v. State

405 S.E.2d 495, 261 Ga. 414, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 348
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 3, 1991
DocketS91A0614
StatusPublished

This text of 405 S.E.2d 495 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. State, 405 S.E.2d 495, 261 Ga. 414, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 348 (Ga. 1991).

Opinion

Hunt, Justice.

John A. Hudson was convicted in probate court in Upson County of driving under the influence of alcohol. His conviction was affirmed by the superior court. He appeals raising the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-6-391 (b), the trial court’s refusal to quash the accusation, admission of the results of the Intoximeter 3000, and failure to direct a verdict of acquittal. We affirm.

An Upson County deputy sheriff stopped the defendant in his car because one headlight was out. The defendant was unable to stand on his own, emitted a strong odor of alcohol, and had glassy, bloodshot eyes. His blood alcohol level on the Intoximeter 3000 measured .17 grams.

1. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol beyond a reasonable doubt. OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (4). Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). It follows that the trial court did not err in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal.

2. The defendant’s argument that OCGA § 40-6-391 (b), requiring proof that a person driving under the influence of a drug the person is legally entitled to use other than alcohol, is unconstitutionally vague has been decided against the defendant in Steele v. State, 260 Ga. 835 (400 SE2d 1) (1991). Compare Proo v. State, 192 Ga. App. 169 (384 SE2d 197) (1989).

3. While the Uniform Traffic Citation issued to the defendant was not the form then in use, the citation showed on its face that it had been approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety as required by OCGA § 40-13-1. Compare Hyatt v. State, 134 Ga. App. 703, 705 (215 SE2d 698) (1975). Minor deficiencies do not render an accusation void. Pryor v. State, 182 Ga. App. 79 (1) (354 SE2d 690) (1987); Miller v. State, 182 Ga. App. 700, 701 (356 SE2d 900) (1987).

4. The defendant’s challenge to the admissibility of the results of the Intoximeter 3000 is controlled adversely to him by Lattarulo v. [415]*415State, 261 Ga. 124 (401 SE2d 516) (1991).

Decided July 3, 1991. Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Virgil L. Brown, Eric D. Hearn, Bentley C. Adams III, for appellant. W. Fletcher Sams, District Attorney, Randall K. Coggin, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Steele v. State
400 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Proo v. State
384 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Pryor v. State
354 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Lattarulo v. State
401 S.E.2d 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Hyatt v. State
215 S.E.2d 698 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Miller v. State
356 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 S.E.2d 495, 261 Ga. 414, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-ga-1991.