Hudson v. State
48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 147, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 52
Opinion
The evidence established the larceny, and that the defendant was in the recent possession of the stolen property. The explanation as to possession was not satisfactory; and the verdict of guilty having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not interfere with his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. State, 48 S.E. 903, 121 Ga. 147, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 52 (Ga. 1904).
48 S.E. 903 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tate v. State
171 S.E. 557 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)