Hudson v. State
105 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 163466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10796 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See, e.g., Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d
[622]*6221236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))); see also Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla.2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. State, 105 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 163466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
105 So. 3d 621 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Barnard v. State
949 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)