Hudson v. State
105 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 163466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527
This text of 105 So. 3d 621 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hudson v. State, 105 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 163466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
Affirmed. See, e.g., Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d
[622]*6221236, 1245-46 (Fla.2004))); see also Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla.2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Barnard v. State
949 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 So. 3d 621, 2013 WL 163466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.