Hudson v. State
This text of 887 So. 2d 365 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this consolidated case, Damian Hudson appeals his conviction of lewd and lascivious molestation after a jury trial. He also appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probation based upon the lewd and lascivious charge.
We reverse the convictions. This court has recently held in West v. State, 876 So.2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), and Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), that Miranda warnings given by the Broward County Sheriffs Office were constitutionally deficient. The same Miranda warnings given in this case, likewise, violate Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The admission of Hudson’s statements was not harmless error.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 So. 2d 365, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11473, 2004 WL 1747374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.