Hudson v. State

819 So. 2d 948, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794, 2002 WL 1369580
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 997
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2002·No. No. 4D00-4498·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. Notwithstanding, we withdraw our original opinion filed May 1, 2002, and substitute the following in lieu thereof.

We reject appellant’s contention the Criminal Punishment Code is unconstitutional. See Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001). We find the additional points raised on appeal unpersuasive, and thus, affirm appellant’s conviction.

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. State, 819 So. 2d 948, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794, 2002 WL 1369580 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

819 So. 2d 948 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
767 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)