Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hudson v. State

616 So. 2d 1229, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 1993 WL 135706

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 30, 1993

DocketNo. 92-01515

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 1229 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. State, 616 So. 2d 1229, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 1993 WL 135706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. We strike special conditions 6, 10, 11 and 13 from the written order of community control and special condition 6 from the written order of probation because these conditions were neither pronounced at sentencing nor statutorily authorized. Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. We strike special conditions 6, 10, 11 and 13 from the written order of community control and special condition 6 from the written order of probation because these conditions were neither pronounced at sentencing nor statutorily authorized. Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 1229, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 1993 WL 135706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack