Hudson v. State

375 So. 2d 355, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 So. 2d 899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1979·No. No. 79-1094·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of the summary denial without hearing of his motion seeking relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Although none of the numerous other grounds asserted by Hudson have even facial merit, he does allege that he was represented in the trial court, without his knowledge or consent, by legal interns who were not members of the Florida Bar. On the authority of Cheatham v. State, 364 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and Huckelbury v. State, 337 So.2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), we reverse the order under review and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this ground alone.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. State, 375 So. 2d 355, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

375 So. 2d 355 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheatham v. State
364 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Huckelbury v. State
337 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)