Hudson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
This text of 716 So. 2d 327 (Hudson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Toni Hudson appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) on her claim for uninsured motorist’s (UM) benefits under her parents’ automobile insurance policies. State Farm cross-appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment regarding Hudson’s claim for UM benefits under her own policy.
On Hudson’s appeal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting summary judgment. We dismiss State Farm’s cross-appeal because the order denying the motion for summary judgment is a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
716 So. 2d 327, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10385, 1998 WL 472804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-fladistctapp-1998.