Hudson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hudson v. State

93 S.W.3d 694, 351 Ark. 383, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 651

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 19, 2002

DocketCR 02-1283

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 93 S.W.3d 694 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. State, 93 S.W.3d 694, 351 Ark. 383, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 651 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Allan Wayne Hudson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Attorney Dale E. Adams admits by motion that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant,' is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Allan Wayne Hudson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Attorney Dale E. Adams admits by motion that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant,' is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.W.3d 694, 351 Ark. 383, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-ark-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack