Hudson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hudson v. State

122 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 641

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 1928·No. 4 Div. 391.·Published

Opinion

.SAMFOEt), J.

The charge in this indictment is purely statutory. The question is: Did the defendant have intercourse with a girl, and was she over the age of 12 and under 16 years of age? Time and venue being shown, the issues are narrow and simple. The facts in this case, without dispute, prove every material averment. Upon the record as it here appears, none of the rulings *642 of the court, even if error, could have affected the result. There is no error. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.SAMFOEt), J.

The charge in this indictment is purely statutory. The question is: Did the defendant have intercourse with a girl, and was she over the age of 12 and under 16 years of age? Time and venue being shown, the issues are narrow and simple. The facts in this case, without dispute, prove every material averment. Upon the record as it here appears, none of the rulings *642 of the court, even if error, could have affected the result. There is no error. Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hudson v. State, 122 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 641 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

122 So. 923 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.