Hudson v. Spisak

128 S. Ct. 373, 552 U.S. 945
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 2007·No. 06-1535·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

128 S.Ct. 373 (2007)

Stuart HUDSON, Warden, petitioner,
v.
Frank G. SPISAK, Jr.

No. 06-1535.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 9, 2007.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007).

Justice STEVENS, Justice GINSBURG, and Justice BREYER would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Spisak, 128 S. Ct. 373, 552 U.S. 945 (U.S. 2007).

128 S. Ct. 373 (Hudson v. Spisak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Alonzo
26 A.3d 109 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Goff v. Bagley
601 F.3d 445 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Smith v. Spisak
558 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 2010)
El-Masri v. United States
128 S. Ct. 373 (Supreme Court, 2007)