Hudson v. Spisak
This text of 128 S. Ct. 373 (Hudson v. Spisak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stuart HUDSON, Warden, petitioner,
v.
Frank G. SPISAK, Jr.
Supreme Court of United States.
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007).
Justice STEVENS, Justice GINSBURG, and Justice BREYER would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S. Ct. 373, 552 U.S. 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-spisak-scotus-2007.