Hudson v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Hudson v. Schumacher

749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 334, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2533

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 3, 1988

Docket84-0480; CA A39100

StatusPublished

This text of 749 P.2d 138 (Hudson v. Schumacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Schumacher, 749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 334, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2533 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant Evan Oliver appeals from a judgment holding that he had entered into a contract for the sale of real property to the Schumachers. We modify the judgment in one respect and affirm it as modified.

Respondents concede that the trial court erred in determining that the balance on the Oliver-Schumacher contract is $42,100. The trial court should not have given the Schumachers credit for monies paid by them prior to November 7,1983, or for the Schumachers’ deposit in escrow. Those amounts are $1,875 and $2,400, respectively. Accordingly, the judgment is modified to provide that the balance due on the Oliver-Schumacher contract is $46,375.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant Evan Oliver appeals from a judgment holding that he had entered into a contract for the sale of real property to the Schumachers. We modify the judgment in one respect and affirm it as modified.

Respondents concede that the trial court erred in determining that the balance on the Oliver-Schumacher contract is $42,100. The trial court should not have given the Schumachers credit for monies paid by them prior to November 7,1983, or for the Schumachers’ deposit in escrow. Those amounts are $1,875 and $2,400, respectively. Accordingly, the judgment is modified to provide that the balance due on the Oliver-Schumacher contract is $46,375.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

749 P.2d 138, 89 Or. App. 334, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 2533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-schumacher-orctapp-1988.