Hudson v. Remington Arms Co.

Fifth Circuit

Hudson v. Remington Arms Co.

131 F. App'x 449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 2005

Docket04-60635

StatusUnpublished

This text of 131 F. App'x 449 (Hudson v. Remington Arms Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Remington Arms Co., 131 F. App'x 449 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its June 10, 2003 Oral Bench Opinion. See also Bridges v. Metabolife Intern., Inc., 119 Fed.Appx. 660, 2005 WL 65498 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its June 10, 2003 Oral Bench Opinion. See also Bridges v. Metabolife Intern., Inc., 119 Fed.Appx. 660, 2005 WL 65498 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-remington-arms-co-ca5-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack