Hudson v. Perry

146 S.E. 635, 167 Ga. 790, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 36
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 1929
DocketNo. 6898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 635 (Hudson v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Perry, 146 S.E. 635, 167 Ga. 790, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 36 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Under express provision of the will, the widow as executrix had full power to sell the property sued for, and to execute valid transfers of title to the purchaser. The power to sell was not limited by any condition such as a “necessity” to sell for support.

2. The majority of the court hold that the evidence did not demand a finding that the sale of the property was bona fide.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., who dissent from the judgment of reversal. E. L. Smith, for plaintiffs. Bennet & Peacock, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comer v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
185 S.E. 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 635, 167 Ga. 790, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-perry-ga-1929.