Hudson v. National Football League Management Council

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nnn ee ee eee KX CHRISTOPHER HUDSON, in his individual capacity on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 4483 (GHW) JUDGMENT NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE BERT BELL/PETE ROZELLE NFL PLAYER RETIREMENT PLAN, KATHERINE “KATIE” BLACKBURN, RICHARD “DICK” CASS, TED PHILLIPS, SAMUEL MCCULLUM, ROBERT SMITH, and JEFFREY VAN NOTE, Defendants. wane ee eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 31, 2020, Defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted; Hudson has failed to remedy the deficiencies the Court identified in his original complaint. Because the Court has already granted Hudson leave to replead once and Hudson has failed to cure the deficiencies in his pleading, the Court concludes that repleading would be futile. Accordingly, the Court will not again grant Hudson leave to replead. See Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc., 106 F.3d 11, 18 (2d Cir. 1997) (explaining that leave to amend need not be granted where the proposed amendment would be futile), and the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2020 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court, BY: D . ) Dany Clerk