Hudson v. McKenzie

New York Court of Common Pleas

Hudson v. McKenzie

1 E.D. Smith 358

DecidedMarch 15, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 1 E.D. Smith 358 (Hudson v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. McKenzie, 1 E.D. Smith 358 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court. Daly, J.

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was right. It was found that G. W. and J. C. Comstock were partners, hut nothing appears in the case to show that the assignment related to a matter within the scope of the partnership business, and unless that clearly appeared, the assignment of the bond by J. C. Comstock, in the partnership name, would confer no title.

Judgment of nonsuit affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court. Daly, J.

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was right. It was found that G. W. and J. C. Comstock were partners, hut nothing appears in the case to show that the assignment related to a matter within the scope of the partnership business, and unless that clearly appeared, the assignment of the bond by J. C. Comstock, in the partnership name, would confer no title.

Judgment of nonsuit affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 E.D. Smith 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-mckenzie-nyctcompl-1852.