Hudson v. McKenzie

New York Court of Common Pleas

Hudson v. McKenzie

1 E.D. Smith 358

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided March 15, 1852·Published

Opinion

By the Court. Daly, J.

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was right. It was found that G. W. and J. C. Comstock were partners, hut nothing appears in the case to show that the assignment related to a matter within the scope of the partnership business, and unless that clearly appeared, the assignment of the bond by J. C. Comstock, in the partnership name, would confer no title.

Judgment of nonsuit affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court. Daly, J.

We are of opinion that the nonsuit was right. It was found that G. W. and J. C. Comstock were partners, hut nothing appears in the case to show that the assignment related to a matter within the scope of the partnership business, and unless that clearly appeared, the assignment of the bond by J. C. Comstock, in the partnership name, would confer no title.

Judgment of nonsuit affirmed.

Hudson v. McKenzie, 1 E.D. Smith 358 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1852).

Pincite

1 E.D. Smith 358 (Hudson v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.