Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.
49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88
This text of 49 S.E. 735 (Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co., 49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1905).
Opinion
This case is controlled by the ruling in Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co., 120 Ga. 628, wherein it was held, that pending the bankruptcy proceedings the holder of a note containing a waiver of homestead has no remedy at law, but must enforce his rights arising from the waiver in a court of equity.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bowen & Thomas v. Keller
60 S.E. 174 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Wright v. Horne
51 S.E. 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-lamar-taylor-riley-drug-co-ga-1905.