Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.
49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88
Opinion
This case is controlled by the ruling in Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co., 120 Ga. 628, wherein it was held, that pending the bankruptcy proceedings the holder of a note containing a waiver of homestead has no remedy at law, but must enforce his rights arising from the waiver in a court of equity.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co., 49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1905).
49 S.E. 735 (Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowen & Thomas v. Keller
60 S.E. 174 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Wright v. Horne
51 S.E. 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)