Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.

49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 30, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lamar, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling in Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co., 120 Ga. 628, wherein it was held, that pending the bankruptcy proceedings the holder of a note containing a waiver of homestead has no remedy at law, but must enforce his rights arising from the waiver in a court of equity.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. M. A. Hawkins, for plaintiff in error. Lane & Park, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co., 49 S.E. 735, 121 Ga. 835, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 88 (Ga. 1905).

49 S.E. 735 (Hudson v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen & Thomas v. Keller
60 S.E. 174 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Wright v. Horne
51 S.E. 30 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)