Hudson v. Jones

West Virginia Supreme Court

Hudson v. Jones

69 S.E. 980, 68 W. Va. 492, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 153

DecidedDecember 20, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 69 S.E. 980 (Hudson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Jones, 69 S.E. 980, 68 W. Va. 492, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 153 (W. Va. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBINSON, PRESIDENT:

Plaintiff has judgment. Defendant says that it is invalid because one of the jury commissioners was not sworn when the panel was drawn from which came the jury that tried the issue. The question is properly raised by exceptions to the overruling of motions attacking the legality of the jury In State v. Medley, (36 W. Va. 216, we held that it is proper to overrule such attack. Points 1 and 2 of the syllabus in that case control here. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBINSON, PRESIDENT:

Plaintiff has judgment. Defendant says that it is invalid because one of the jury commissioners was not sworn when the panel was drawn from which came the jury that tried the issue. The question is properly raised by exceptions to the overruling of motions attacking the legality of the jury In State v. Medley, (36 W. Va. 216, we held that it is proper to overrule such attack. Points 1 and 2 of the syllabus in that case control here. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 S.E. 980, 68 W. Va. 492, 1910 W. Va. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-jones-wva-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack