Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.

178 F. App'x 931
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 28, 2006·No. 05-16738·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant-plaintiff Kevin H. Hudson (Hudson) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of International Computer Negotiations, Inc. (ICN) and against Hudson’s claims arising under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA), the Florida Civil Rights Act, FI. Stat. § 760, et seq. (FCRA), as well as a state law claim for negligent misrepresentation. After carefully reviewing the record on appeal and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm this appeal for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated November 16, 2005, finding that Hudson’s “utter inability to support his claims” made them “little more than frivolous.”

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc., 178 F. App'x 931 (11th Cir. 2006).

178 F. App'x 931 (Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.
499 F.3d 1252 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)