Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.
This text of 178 F. App'x 931 (Hudson v. International Computer Negotiations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant-plaintiff Kevin H. Hudson (Hudson) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of International Computer Negotiations, Inc. (ICN) and against Hudson’s claims arising under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (ERISA), the Florida Civil Rights Act, FI. Stat. § 760, et seq. (FCRA), as well as a state law claim for negligent misrepresentation. After carefully reviewing the record on appeal and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm this appeal for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated November 16, 2005, finding that Hudson’s “utter inability to support his claims” made them “little more than frivolous.”
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 F. App'x 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-international-computer-negotiations-inc-ca11-2006.