Hudson v. Hudson

78 So. 965, 201 Ala. 569, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 149
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 16, 1918
Docket6 Div. 696.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 So. 965 (Hudson v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Hudson, 78 So. 965, 201 Ala. 569, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 149 (Ala. 1918).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The bill is filed by complainant, Mrs. Hudson, for an absolute divorce on the ground of cruelty, and for temporary and permanent alimony, and to secure for herself the undisputed custody of her two minor children. The decree of the circuit court grants all the relief prayed for.

The evidence is conflicting upon all of the vital issues. The testimony was taken ore tenus before the trial judge, who had the parties and witnesses before him, and was therefore better able than we are to judge of the true character and relations of the parties, and of the credibility of the various witnesses. Our careful review of the testimony does not justify us in reaching any conclusions thereon contrary to the findings of the trial court, and the decree appealed from will be in all respects affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George v. George
50 So. 2d 744 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 So. 965, 201 Ala. 569, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-hudson-ala-1918.