Hudson v. Hodge.

51 S.E. 955, 139 N.C. 308, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 127
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 17, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam:

Action for rent begun before a justice of the peace. The defendant denied plaintiff’s title and lease, and the justice properly dismissed the action. The Code, sections 836, 837; Hahn v. Guilford, 87 N. C., 172. The judge below should have taken the same course. The litigation over the title and tenancy were before us at this term, Hodge v. Hudson.

Action Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Hodge., 51 S.E. 955, 139 N.C. 308, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 127 (N.C. 1905).

51 S.E. 955 (Hudson v. Hodge.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. Burden
1910 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)