Hudson v. Gunn

92 S.E. 546, 20 Ga. App. 95, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 733
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1917
Docket8061
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 546 (Hudson v. Gunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Gunn, 92 S.E. 546, 20 Ga. App. 95, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 733 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. In this State the lien of a mortgage does not pass title or carry with it the right of possession by the mortgagee. Civil Code (1910), § 3256.

(o) The mortgagee can not, by an attempted purchase of mortgaged property, divest an intervening title of which notice is had. McIntyre v. Ferst’s Sons & Co., 101 Ga. 682 (28 S. E. 989; Booze v. Neal, 6 Ga. App. 279 (2), 281 (64 S. E. 1104).

[96]*96Decided May 11, 1917. Trover; from Warren superior court—Judge Walker. October 4, 1916. L. D. McGregor, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, contra.

(6) The issue in an action of trover is ordinarily one of title. Berry v. Jackson, 115 Ga. 196 (41 S. E. 698, 90 Am. St. R. 102) ; Harden v. . Lang, 110 Ga. 392, 397 (36 S. E 100) ; Campbell v. Trunnell, 67 Ga. 518. The object of such a suit is the recovery of specific property' claimed, or its equivalent in money. Milltown Lumber Co. v. Carter, 5 Ga. App. 344 (63 S. E. 270). In such an action it is only incumbent on the plaintiff to show his title, conversion by the defendant, and, where he elects to take a money judgment, the value of the property. Pryor v. Brady, 115 Ga. 848, 850 (42 S. E. 223); Rushin v. Tharpe, 86 Ga. 779, 780 (15 S. E. 830) ; White v. White, 71 Ga. 670 (2).

2. While one holding title under a mortgagor can not acquire an interest in the property adverse to rights of the mortgagee of which he had previous notice (Towler v. Carithers, 4 Ga. App. 517, 61 S. E. 1132), still a judgment for the property sued for may be rendered in trover in favor of one so claiming and against such a mortgagee in possession, without a tender of the amount due on the mortgage, such a recovery being in fact'subject to the mortgagee’s right of foreclosure. In those jurisdictions in which a mortgage passes title a different rule may obtain, and the plaintiff in trover might be required to tender the amount due on such mortgage as a prerequisite to his action.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LANGDALE COMPANY v. Day
153 S.E.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Buice v. Campbell
108 S.E.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Raines v. Graham
70 S.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Maddox v. Carithers
47 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Blankenship v. Johnston
170 S.E. 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Carter v. Spiegel, May Stern Co.
166 S.E. 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Dugas Corp. v. Georgia Power Co.
159 S.E. 592 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 546, 20 Ga. App. 95, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-gunn-gactapp-1917.