Hudson v. . Greensboro

117 S.E. 629, 185 N.C. 502, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 106
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 26, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 117 S.E. 629 (Hudson v. . Greensboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. . Greensboro, 117 S.E. 629, 185 N.C. 502, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 106 (N.C. 1923).

Opinion

This was a proceeding to obtain an injunction against the city of Greensboro carrying out its contract with the Southern Railway Company to issue $1,300,000 in bonds for the purpose of loaning *Page 529 the same to the Southern Railway Company for the construction of a passenger station at Greensboro and an underpass, (503) etc.

The General Assembly of North Carolina, at the Extra Session of 1920, passed an act, Private Laws, ch. 105, ratified 23 August, 1920, which authorized the city of Greensboro to issue bonds not to exceed $1,300,000, the proceeds of which were to be loaned for the construction of a station building, an underpass, etc., by the Southern Railway Company in accordance with plans to be agreed upon between the city and the company, the bonds to mature thirty years from date bearing not to exceed 6 per cent interest. The act further provided that the governing board of the city should call an election to submit the proposed contract and the question of the issue of the bonds as aforesaid to the qualified voters of the city, and that, if approved, the railroad company was to convey the necessary land free of all encumbrance to a trustee, to be held until the Southern Railway Company should, by monthly rentals, have paid the said trustee a sum of money sufficient to take care of the interest on the bonds issued for the purpose aforesaid and to provide a sinking fund to discharge all of said debt at maturity with accrued interest, and the railroad company was required to take care of the necessary repairs and pay taxes upon the property and upon the repayment of the sum advanced by the city, the trustee should reconvey the property to the railroad company.

On 11 April, 1922, an election was held in which the qualified voters of the city of Greensboro approved the proposed contract and authorized the issuing of the bonds and carrying out of the contract. It appears from the record that the number of qualified voters at said election was 3,428, of whom 2,145 voted to approve the action aforesaid, and 271 voted against it. The contract thus proposed and authorized was executed 12 February, 1923, and the construction work would have been commenced but for the intervention of the proceedings in this case. The Southern Railway Company has secured releases from the trustees in the four deeds of trust covering the property proposed to be released, and also a conveyance from its lessor, the North Carolina Railroad Company.

The court finds as a fact that no conveyance of title has yet been executed to the said Southern Railway Company, nor to the Greensboro Bank and Trust Company as trustee, by virtue of the aforesaid contract, but that it would have been executed and delivered but for the institution of this suit.

The following is the contract of the parties, and the act of the Legislature under which the contract was made and submitted to the people, *Page 530 the proceedings of the city council and the return of the election thereon and the map of the premises: (504)

[EDITORS' NOTE: THE MAP IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.], SEE 185 N.C. 530.]

AGREEMENT.

An agreement, made and entered into this 12 February, (505) 1923, by and between city of Greensboro, a municipal corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter for convenience styled "City," and Southern Railway Company, a corporation, organized and existing *Page 531 under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Virginia, qualified to engage in the business of common carrier in the State of North Carolina, hereinafter for convenience styled "railway company," and Greensboro Bank and Trust Company, a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter for convenience styled "trustee."

Witnesseth, That whereas the city desires to promote the general good, convenience, and safety of its citizens by constructing in the city of Greensboro, N.C. a passenger station, together with all necessary appurtenances thereto, and in connection therewith a certain underpass eliminating a dangerous grade crossing, all as more particularly hereinafter identified, which will promote the prosperity and general welfare of the community; and

Whereas, in order to secure the necessary authority to the city to effectuate said public purpose, the General Assembly of North Carolina passed and there was ratified on 23 August, 1920, "An act authorizing the city of Greensboro to issue bonds for the purpose of building a passenger station," said act being chapter 105 of the Private Laws of the General Assembly of North Carolina, Extra Session 1920, copy of which act is hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A," now referred to and made a part hereof; and

Whereas the right of the city to issue bonds as provided in said act has been secured by the approval of a majority of the qualified voters of said city determined at an election duly and legally called and held in the city on 11 April, 1922, the result of which election is shown by the certificate of the judges of said election hereto attached, marked Exhibit "B"; and

Whereas the railway company owns, controls, leases, and operates lines of railroad entering the city of Greensboro, N.C. and is engaged in the operation of passenger trains and the transportation of passengers thereon to and from the said city of Greensboro; and

Whereas, the railway company is willing to convey or have conveyed to said trustee upon the trusts hereinafter recited, title to the land upon which the said passenger station and its appurtenances is to be erected, and to enter into a rental contract for the use and occupancy of said station building and accessories in accordance with the terms hereof: Now, therefore, this agreement witnesseth:

CITY'S COVENANTS.

That the city, for and in consideration of the covenants of the railway company and the trustee hereinafter expressed, (506) hereby covenants and agrees: *Page 532

1. That upon conveyance to Greensboro Bank and Trust Company, trustee, by Southern Railway Company, or at its direction, of the land hereinafter specifically described upon which the station is to be erected, with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances, satisfactory to the city, as shown by certificate of the mayor of the city to be attached to said trust deed, the city, through its duly authorized governing board, and by regular ordinance, will issue and deliver to the trustee, its "City of Greensboro — North Carolina Passenger Terminal Thirty Year Gold Bonds," authorized by the act of the General Assembly of North Carolina ratified on 23 August, 1920, hereinbefore referred to, in an aggregate amount of not exceeding one million, three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000) par value. Said bonds shall mature thirty years from the date thereof and shall bear interest at not exceeding six (6) per cent per annum, payable semiannually.

2. The city hereby agrees and binds itself at the meeting of its governing board, to be held at the time now fixed by law in each year, or which may hereafter be fixed as the time for levying the taxes of the city, or as soon thereafter as may be, during each year of the thirty-year term of said bonds, to levy a tax sufficient to pay the interest that may be then due and to provide that year's proportionate part of the sinking fund for the payment of the principal of said bonds at maturity, the amount of interest, and the amount to be paid into the sinking fund to be annually certified by the trustee to the governing body of the city: Provided

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WidenI77 v. NC Dep't of Transp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017
Wideni77 v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., & I-77 Mobility Partners LLC
800 S.E.2d 441 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Maready v. City of Winston-Salem
467 S.E.2d 615 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1996)
Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morganton
386 S.E.2d 200 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1989)
Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing Authority
159 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Mitchell v. NORTH CAROLINA INDUS. DEVELOP. FIN. AU.
159 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Green v. . Kitchin
50 S.E.2d 545 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Brumley v. . Baxter
36 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Turner v. . Reidsville
29 S.E.2d 211 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Turner v. City of Reidsville
224 N.C. 42 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Martin v. Board of Commissioners
208 N.C. 354 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 629, 185 N.C. 502, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-greensboro-nc-1923.