Hudson v. Glens Falls Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hudson v. Glens Falls Insurance

162 A.D. 934, 147 N.Y.S. 1117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D. 934 (Hudson v. Glens Falls Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Glens Falls Insurance, 162 A.D. 934, 147 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. That part of the 21st finding of fact, to the effect that the statements made by the adjuster to the plaintiff at the time of the settlement were misrepresentations, either of fact or law, is disapproved, and stricken out. Held, that the tenant had no insurable interest in that part of the hay destroyed which was necessary to winter out the stock. All Concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. That part of the 21st finding of fact, to the effect that the statements made by the adjuster to the plaintiff at the time of the settlement were misrepresentations, either of fact or law, is disapproved, and stricken out. Held, that the tenant had no insurable interest in that part of the hay destroyed which was necessary to winter out the stock. All Concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D. 934, 147 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-glens-falls-insurance-nyappdiv-1914.