Hudson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.

139 S.W. 618, 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 1197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 1196
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 29, 1911·Published

Opinion

LEVY, J.

Appellant, a boy about 11 years old, was a passenger in the sleeper attached to one of appellee’s trains. The sleeper was derailed. It was claimed that the accident was due to negligence on appellee’s part, proximately causing personal injury to appellant. The verdict was in favor of appellee. The assignment of error is that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The appeal is a companion one on the facts to Mary Hudson, by next friend, v. Ft. W. & D. C. Ry. Co., 139 S. W. 617, this day decided by this court. What is there said disposes of this appeal.

The judgment was ordered affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co., 139 S.W. 618, 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 1197 (Tex. Ct. App. 1911).

139 S.W. 618 (Hudson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.
139 S.W. 617 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)