Hudson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

755 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3952, 2000 WL 346139
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2000·No. No. 99-1732·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the appeal referee correctly found, the appellant was not eligible for the unemployment compensation benefits sought in this proceeding simply because she had not been employed for a qualifying period under the statute. See § 443.091(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). While she cogently argues that she was improperly denied re-employment because of her age, neither the Unemployment Appeals Commission nor this court has the lawful authority to consider that issue. Hence, we have no choice but to affirm the order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 755 So. 2d 764, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3952, 2000 WL 346139 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 764 (Hudson v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cacho v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
924 So. 2d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)