Hudson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
26 S.E. 75, 100 Ga. 83, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 558
Opinion
The plaintiff, by introducing in evidence the note sued upon, established a prima facie right to recover, and the burden of sustaining the plea of usury was upon the defendant. There being no evidence to show that the plaintiff had received, or charged, any usury whatever, or to negative the conclusion that it had not actually parted with the full amount for which the note was given, the court did not err in directing a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 26 S.E. 75, 100 Ga. 83, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 558 (Ga. 1896).
26 S.E. 75 (Hudson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London Ltd.
32 S.E. 153 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Barnes v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
30 S.E. 943 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)