Hudson v. Doyle

California Supreme Court

Hudson v. Doyle

6 Cal. 101

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 101 (Hudson v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Doyle, 6 Cal. 101 (Cal. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion opinion of the Court was delivered by by Mr. Justice Heydefeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred. •

The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the objects If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion opinion of the Court was delivered by by Mr. Justice Heydefeldt.

Mr. Justice Terry concurred. •

The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the objects If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Cal. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-doyle-cal-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack