Hudson v. Doyle
6 Cal. 101
Opinion
Mr. Justice Terry concurred. •
The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the objects If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. Doyle, 6 Cal. 101 (Cal. 1856).
6 Cal. 101 (Hudson v. Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. White
62 P. 1062 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Willis v. Farley
24 Cal. 490 (California Supreme Court, 1864)