Hudson v. Commissioner
This text of 18 T.C.M. 62 (Hudson v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
RAUM, Judge: Petitioners on January 9, 1959, filed a "Motion to Amend Findings", requesting that the findings heretofore entered December 23, 1958 (
On consideration of the motion, it is
ORDERED: That the request contained in paragraph numbered "1." of the motion be and the same is hereby denied, because the Court is not satisfied that the proposed finding is true. It is further
ORDERED: That the request contained in paragraph numbered "2." of the motion is granted, and page 17 of the Findings of Fact is amended by striking the sentence beginning "However, the books * * *" and ending "* * * covering nine units" and inserting in lieu thereof:
"However, the books of Hudson Body Company do reveal that in 1951 petitioner advanced $507,200.51 to Jones, J. R. Jones Company and/or Texas Coach Sales Company in 18 transactions covering 219 units; in 1952 he advanced $40,690.83 in two trans-actions covering 17 units; in 1953, $22,931.60 in five transactions covering nine units."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 T.C.M. 62, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-commissioner-tax-1959.