Hudson v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hudson v. Cohen

128 S.E. 205, 34 Ga. App. 119, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 55

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 19, 1925

Docket16196

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 205 (Hudson v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Cohen, 128 S.E. 205, 34 Ga. App. 119, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

The judgment of the municipal court of Atlanta in favor of the plaintiff in a suit on account was not to be treated as a nullity merely because it was rendered without first requiring the plaintiff to comply with a demand filed by the defendant for a bill of particulars. Civil Code (1910), § 5960; Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (1) (75 S. E. 518); Hudson v. Cohen, 32 Ga. App. 299 (122 S. E. 718). The superior court did not err in dismissing the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

The judgment of the municipal court of Atlanta in favor of the plaintiff in a suit on account was not to be treated as a nullity merely because it was rendered without first requiring the plaintiff to comply with a demand filed by the defendant for a bill of particulars. Civil Code (1910), § 5960; Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (1) (75 S. E. 518); Hudson v. Cohen, 32 Ga. App. 299 (122 S. E. 718). The superior court did not err in dismissing the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 S.E. 205, 34 Ga. App. 119, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-cohen-gactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack