Hudson v. Cohen
128 S.E. 205, 34 Ga. App. 119, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 55
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson v. Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Ga. App. 299 →
Opinion
The judgment of the municipal court of Atlanta in favor of the plaintiff in a suit on account was not to be treated as a nullity merely because it was rendered without first requiring the plaintiff to comply with a demand filed by the defendant for a bill of particulars. Civil Code (1910), § 5960; Hill v. Harris, 11 Ga. App. 358 (1) (75 S. E. 518); Hudson v. Cohen, 32 Ga. App. 299 (122 S. E. 718). The superior court did not err in dismissing the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. Cohen, 128 S.E. 205, 34 Ga. App. 119, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
128 S.E. 205 (Hudson v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Harris
75 S.E. 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Hudson v. Cohen
122 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)