Hudson v. Clark

Texas Supreme Court

Hudson v. Clark

26 Tex. 291

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 Tex. 291 (Hudson v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. Clark, 26 Tex. 291 (Tex. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler C. J.

There manifestly is no error in the judgment. The witness had no interest in the event of the suit. Hor could the verdict and judgment in this suit be given in evidence for or against him in any suit then pending, or which might be instituted upon the fifty dollar note upon which he was a surety. He was not a party to the record, had no interest in the suit,-—and the judgment which might be rendered in it, could in no way affect the decision of any other suit in which he might be a party. (11 Tex. R. 127.)

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler C. J.

There manifestly is no error in the judgment. The witness had no interest in the event of the suit. Hor could the verdict and judgment in this suit be given in evidence for or against him in any suit then pending, or which might be instituted upon the fifty dollar note upon which he was a surety. He was not a party to the record, had no interest in the suit,-—and the judgment which might be rendered in it, could in no way affect the decision of any other suit in which he might be a party. (11 Tex. R. 127.)

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Tex. 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-clark-tex-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack