Hudson v. Carmichael

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hudson v. Carmichael

187 S.E. 879, 183 Ga. 216, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 204

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1936·No. No. 11442·Published

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

This is a suit for injunction and other equitable relief. The main facts in the ease appear in the former report of the case. Hudson v. Carmichael, 181 Ca. 317 (181 S. E. 853). On the last trial the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and upon examina[217] lion of the record we are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. There are no special assignments of error.

No. 11442. October 15, 1936. A. F. Jenkins and Miles W. Lems, for plaintiff. C. S. Baldwin Jr., for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, Presiding Justice.

This is a suit for injunction and other equitable relief. The main facts in the ease appear in the former report of the case. Hudson v. Carmichael, 181 Ca. 317 (181 S. E. 853). On the last trial the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and upon examina[217] lion of the record we are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. There are no special assignments of error.

No. 11442. October 15, 1936. A. F. Jenkins and Miles W. Lems, for plaintiff. C. S. Baldwin Jr., for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent because of illness.

Hudson v. Carmichael, 187 S.E. 879, 183 Ga. 216, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 204 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

187 S.E. 879 (Hudson v. Carmichael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related