Hudson v. Canal Authority

213 So. 2d 727
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1968·No. No. 1-408·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have studied the record and briefs filed herein and heard argument of counsel and are convinced and so hold that the primary questions involved herein have been answered adversely to the appellant in the following cases: Staplin v. Canal Authority, 208 So.2d 853 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Couse v. Canal Authority, 197 So.2d 841 (Fla.App. 1st, 1967) and 209 So.2d 865 (Fla.1968) and therefore on the authority of the cases cited supra, the order appealed from is hereby Affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and PATTEN, GEO. L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. Canal Authority, 213 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

213 So. 2d 727 (Hudson v. Canal Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Couse v. Canal Authority
209 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Staplin v. Canal Authority
208 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Couse v. Canal Authority
197 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)